- Discover essay samples

Politics of Western Europe

4.9 of 5.0 (206 reviews)

1018 words

Politics of Western Europe Page 1
Politics of Western Europe Page 2
Politics of Western Europe Page 3
Politics of Western Europe Page 4
Politics of Western Europe Page 5
Politics of Western Europe Page 6
The above thumbnails are of reduced quality. To view the work in full quality, click download.

Politics of Western Europe


This is a critique of the book, Blood and Belonging, by Michael
Ignatieff. This paper will explain the subject of the book and its
relevance, discuss Michael Ignatieff's methods and conclusions on the
subject and finally include a personal critique of the book by the
author of this paper.
The author of the book travels on what he terms 'the six
journeys.? On these ?journeys? he encounters different cultures, as he
travels to six different coinciding areas of the world. He examines
the unique expression of nationalism that each populace displays by
interviewing various members of that particular society. The six areas
that he travels to are specifically chosen for the clarity which
nationalism is expressed in society. Nationalism is a factor
contributing toward both present possible future instability in these
These areas are former Yugoslavia (specifically Croatia and
Serbia), Germany, Ukraine, Quebec, Kurdistan and Northern Ireland.
According to Ignatieff, in Croatia and Serbia there is a desire for a
separate identity between the two nations. The fear of losing one's
national identity has caused ethnic hatred. A terror so strong and
historically persistent, it has driven people to a desperate state to
do anything. This is a large contributor to the reasons for the extreme
violence present there today. The author states, ?A Croat, thus, is
someone who is not a Serb. A Serb is someone who is not a Croat.?
This quotation profoundly expresses the short-sighted mentality present
in their conflict.
In his travels in Germany, the author points out an important
question. Does the nation make the state, or the state the nation?
This question by far does not stop here, especially when Germany is the
subject. The essence of the German people is seen by some as aggressive
and offensive, thus the existence of the German problem. If the nation
makes the state then Germany will always be a threat. If the state
makes the nation, then the aggressive nature of the German nation, which
lead the world into two global wars, can be harnessed and redirected.
The question has its roots and answers in the recent reunification of
The Ukraine is concerned with not being Russian. It is here
Ignatieff receives a complete vision of what nationalism is. He states,
?I understand what nationalism really is: the dream that a whole nation
could be like a congregation; singing the same hymns, listening to the
same gospel, sharing the same emotions, linked not only to each other
but to the dead buried beneath their feet.?
Quebec is a model that presents a possible future of the state
system. Ignatieff uses the example of Quebec to illustrate the
relationship between nationalism and federalism. He implies that ?if
federalism fails in Canada it can fail anywhere.? If the balance
between ?ethnic and civil principles? is not maintained in Canada, who
is not an impoverished country and has a large, successful economy; then
perhaps the modern world has not transcended the grasps of nationalism.
The Kurds represent a nation without a state, who find
themselves surrounded by other nations who are more aggressive
nationalists. The term Kurdistan is a definition of the areas used by
Ignatieff to explain the area of major Kurdish populace concentration.
There is no real borders, no flag, no government and Kurds must
acknowledge the state in which they reside (i.e., - Syria, Turkey, Iran
and Iraq), of which, is not Kurdistan.
Finally, the sixth journey ends in Northern Ireland. He makes
the observation that this is the ideal place to conclude his project.
Northern Ireland contains a recurrence of the themes that seemed so
prevalent in the other journeys. In Ireland ethnicity, religion and
politics are all bound into one expression or identity. These are also
evident in the five previous studies.
Is Michael Ignatieff's work relevant? The answer to this
question is, yes it is. The issue is important. Nationalism presents
itself as a phenomenon. The questions of why people need to retain a
cultural identity and the way they go about preserving it is still
unanswerable. Evermore unfathomable is the violence permeated through
nationalistic expressions, which are ?necessary? by the parties
involved. The very existence of the enigma created by nationalism
dictates the need to explore the subject in more depth.
The situations in the book are not isolated events. Nationalism
exists in every state all over the world. There is a dichotomy
presented by Ignatieff between nationalism and federalism. He explains
the political doctrine of nationalism by stating ?(1)that the world's
peoples are divided into nations, (2) that these nations should have the
right of self-determination, and (3) that the full self-determination
requires statehood.? Federalism, though not a particular ideology, is a
means of sharing political power among different peoples within a state.
The various systems of government which fall under the definition of
federalism are not problematic to the people; unless, of course, they
are not completely legitimate. If the government is illegitimate, then
ideally nationalism steps in to demand a completely self-determined
government, which renders proper representation to its populace.
Despite the diversity of a state's population, theoretically, harmony is
maintained since the people are properly represented or controlled.
This situation with variation is experienced throughout the world.
States are dynamic, also their government and populace. If the dynamics
of the government or the state do not keep up with the pace of change in
the populace, then instability will rise in the name of nationalism and
shake the very foundation of the ...

You are currently seeing 50% of this paper.

You're seeing 1018 words of 2035.

Keywords: government of western europe, political map of western europe, political characteristics of western europe, political map of western europe with capitals, political structure of western europe, political system of western europe, political units of western europe, politics of religion in western europe modernities in conflict

Similar essays

Canada at war

Any war is a horrific event that may last years. Wars leave a legacy of death and destruction. They aren't just for soldiers and battlefields but for new weapons that make destruction possible on our lands, beneath our seas, and in our air. They bring suffering and death to all families, races and nationalities. No matter where you live dur...

92 reviews

The fierce struggle of European nations to dominate the New World caused the Texas to be ?caught between two fires.? The two fires Everett refers to is not only in respect to white settlers pushing westward and resistance from other tribes to the east, but between removal and extermination. The Texas courageously strived to remain determined in...

152 reviews
Taiwanese Development Model

According to Thomas Gold Taiwan offers a text book case of an elite-led revolution leading to social transformation. The stability of hard authoritarianism of the Taiwanese government laid the groundwork for Taiwanese development. The KMT's cohesiveness and political domination plus the economic development aid supplied by the...

184 reviews
Interest groups

Interest Groups Help More Than Hurt Voter turnout has declined since 1960 but participation in interest groups has been growing. Participating in interest groups allows people to take action on issues that are most important to them. Unlike some linkage institutions, interest groups have a very close connection to government. are an esse...

122 reviews
A background of argentina

In the beginning of Argentina, we recall two major tribes; the Diaguita and the Gaurani who constituted the agricultural origins. During the 1500?s, Spain discovered Argentina, and quickly claimed it for its own. Spain reigned until the 1800?s when it was at war with Britain. In 1816 Argentina declared independence from Spain. After WWII there...

120 reviews
Atsisiųsti šį darbą