Flag desecration

4.9 of 5.0 (148 reviews)

Contains
466 words

Category
Politics

The above thumbnails are of reduced quality. To view the work in full quality, click download.

Flag desecration

By: shane

E-mail: sfdon@uswest.net

Flag Desecration Flag desecration is not American. People who burn the American flag lack respect for themselves, America, and the many people who have died to preserve American freedom. The people who desecrate the American flag have no right to call themselves Americans. They are unpatriotic, two faced, cowards, and worse of all un-American (communist). To be patriotic a person must love and defend his own country against all foreign and domestic threats. These unpatriotic people are two faced. They live in America with all its freedoms, and yet desecrate the most important symbol which holds America together: the flag. The way flag burners go about desecrating the American flag shows that they are not true Americans. Flag burners commit a morally unjust and hateful crime by desecrating the American flag. They are the first to hid behind the first amendment (Freedom of Speech). For people to say they have the right to burn the American flag, sighting their first amendment rights, they have some kind of warped sense of expression. If people continue to desecrate the American flag, it will lose its significance and value. From 1968 to 1989, politicians and true red blooded Americans understood how important it was to respect the American flag. Congress passed a law in which it prohibited desecration of the American flag in 1968. According to the law, it was illegal to cast contempt, either by word or act upon the American flag ((Federal law, 18 USC Sec. 700 States, 1968); Sec. 2(a). The law states that whoever knowingly casts contempt upon any flag of the United States by publicly mutilating, defacing, defiling, burning, or trampling upon it shall be fined, not more than $1,000 or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both, Sec. 2(b). The term "flag of the United States" as used in this section, shall include any flag, standard colors, ensign, or any picture or representation of either, or of any part or parts of either, made of any substance or represented on any substance by which the average person seeing the same without deliberation may believe the same to represent the flag, standards, colors, or ensign of the United States of America". In simple form, the law says that the American flag is to be revered and not abused in an act demeaned as unprofessional. The law was very strict and to the point. For twenty-one years the federal law stood uncontested. This was until the Supreme Court case of Texas vs. Johnson in 1989, when the courts deemed the federal law was unconstitutional. (Texas v. Johnson) Texas v. Johnson was when a group of protesters in Texas burned the American flag. The people involved were protesting the Ronald Reagan administration which was exploiting ...

You are currently seeing 50% of this paper.

You're seeing 466 words of 931.

Read the full essay

Keywords: flag desecration amendment, flag desecration law, flag desecration meaning, flag desecration map, flag desecration amendment 2006, flag desecration amendment pros and cons, flag desecration amendment arguments in favor, flag desecration australia

Similar essays

Benefits of Capital Punishment

Capital Punishment deters murder, and is just Retribution. Capital punishment, is the execution of criminals by the state, for committing crimes, regarded so heinous, that this is the only acceptable punishment. Capital punishment does not only lower the murder rate, but it's value as retribution alone is a good reason for ha...

144 reviews

Download

Homeless Youth

Powers, Jane L. and Barbara Jaklitsch. Reaching the Hard to Reach. Education & Urban Society, Volume 25, Issue 4, August 1993. At some point in time, all teenagers are expected to leave home and venture out on their own. Separating from parents and gaining independence are two central tasks that teenagers must overcome in order to beco...

131 reviews

Download

WetBack

By: Paul R. Serrano Paul Serrano English 1A 7/11/1999 'Wetback' Through my life I have usually been on the receiving end of racist comments, such as wetback fieldworker etc. In seventh grade I had to go to a public school because of moving reasons and that is where the comments started. I can honestly say that it was the worst experience of...

105 reviews

Download

State of Texas vs. Johnson (1989)

Justice Viveiros delivers the opinion of the court: Gregory Lee Johnson has been convicted of desecrating a flag in violation of Texas law; a conviction which questions ones guaranteed First Amendment, constitutional rights. Johnson's involvement in a political demonstration in Dallas, lead him to express his political concerns...

4 reviews

Download

Gender Communication in the Wo

By: Ann Culver Communication between males and females has always been somewhat complicated. Because we are arguing that males and females have different cultures we wanted to take a look at what some of these differences might be. According to our research the inherent differences between male and female culture are the different roles tha...

196 reviews

Download