Corporal Punishment

4.9 of 5.0 (100 reviews)

Download now!

Contains
2526 words

Category
Science

The above thumbnails are of reduced quality. To view the work in full quality, click download.

Corporal Punishment

Outside the sprawling red brick school that serves Olentangy, Ohio's elementary and middle school students, the timeless summer ritual of Little League baseball is in full swing. A modest-sized crowd cheers enthusiastically from bleachers and lawn chairs as one young fielder makes a nice play on the dusty diamond. Inside the school, in front of a much smaller crowd, the Olentangy Local Board of Education is discussing matters of some importance for the would-be baseball stars. The board is reviewing plans to upgrade the field'better dugouts, grass for the infield, safer light poles. Then it turns to a topic that probably is far from the Little Leaguers? minds this evening, but one some of them may be acutely'painfully, to be more precise'aware of some day. The board is debating corporal punishment, a tradition as American as the national pastime itself. The arguments voiced in Olentangy are the same as those reverberating across the country as more and more local school boards and state legislatures consider proposals to ban corporal punishment. Defenders of the practice, many nostalgic for the days when teachers wielded the paddle with impunity, claim that it works: I was paddled and turned out OK, they argue, so what's wrong with paddling today's students? Some intransigent youngsters only respond to a little old-fashioned discipline. Opponents counter with an equally simple argument: Schools shouldn't be in the business of hitting children. They say the practice may temporarily suppress students? bad behavior, but in the long term, it merely teaches violence as the way to solve problems. Parents, opponents point out, could be charged with child abuse if they subjected their kids to many of the disciplinary measures educators legally practice on students. As a recent letter to the editor of The Seattle Times put it: ?If you strike an adult, it's called assault; if you strike an animal, it's called cruelty; if you strike a child, it's called discipline.? After an emotional debate, the Olentangy schoolboard votes 3-2 to keep its current discipline policy. In other words, teachers and principals in the 2,100-student district can still spank youngsters.
Corporal punishment usually is equated with paddling, but more broadly defined, it is any punishment that inflicts bodily pain for disapproved behavior. The corporal punishment abolitionists, as some opponents of this type of discipline call themselves, may have failed in Olentangy, but lately they?ve been winning many of their battles. In just the past five years, more than a dozen states have banned corporal punishment in their schools; last spring, Montana became the 22nd state to do so. Many cities and towns have taken similar action. The anti-corporal-punishment movement has reached every state. Increased sensitivity to child abuse'both in the home and in society at large, including school'has bolstered the movement. Many influential national groups, including the American Bar Association and the American Medical Association, as well as education organizations such as the National Education Association and the National PTA, have all condemned corporal punishment.

Although the abolitionists find these trends encouraging, the numbers don't tell the whole story. Granted, the ranks of non-paddling states are growing; but only a few of those states used corporal punishment widely before banning it. Teachers in many of the states that enacted bans probably didn't notice a difference. Connecticut, for example, reported just 90 cases statewide a few years before its 1989 ban.

And teachers and school officials wield the paddle as often and with as much conviction as ever in many areas, especially the Bible Belt states of the South and Southwest. According to U.S. Education Department figures, more than 1 million students nationwide are spanked each year. (Anti-paddling activists maintain that the true number may be two or three times that.) Texas alone racks up more than 250,000 paddlings per year. Add Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, and Tennessee, each with more than 60,00 0 annual cases, and the number constitutes more than half of the nation's total. Arkansas earns the dubious distinction of leading the country in the proportion of students paddled each year'almost 14 percent.

American teachers who use corporal punishment are almost alone in the world. Among developed countries, only Canada and Australia allow paddling, and entire provinces in both those nations have abolished it; even England, home of the fabled stern, switch-carrying headmaster, abolished corporal punishment six years ago. China, Japan, South Africa, and the Soviet Union'none of them known for their lax school discipline'have all banned corporal punishment.

Why is the practice so ingrained in this country, yet almost extinct else where? Part of the answer, some say, lies with the pervasive violence and aggression in American society; as violence spreads from the streets to the schools, no-nonsense physical punishment holds a gut appeal for many people. Others attribute the lasting popularity of corporal punishment to the influence of conservative religious beliefs about the importance of punishment, even on secular schools. (According to historian Philip Greven, some believers are convinced that God provided the buttocks as a strategic body part for punishment because of their ample cushion and sensitive nerve endings.)

More than anything, however, support for paddling reveals a reluctance to question a practice that occurs in almost every household. ?It's difficult to criticize teachers who do something that parents do in their own homes,? says Jordan Riak, director of Parents and Teachers United Against Violence in Education. ?We are a very violent nation toward our children, but people don't want to face this.?

Greven offers a similar argument in his book Spare the Child: ?Most of us instinctively defend the practice of corporal punishment, partly out of loyalty to our own parents and grandparents, partly out of anxiety about ourselves (especially if we as parents have used physical punishments in rearing and disciplining our own children, as most of us have), and partly out of an unwillingness to think that something so common and so ordinary could be so consequential and so damaging to so many of us.?

Greven's assertion that physical punishments are 'so damaging? undoubtedly antagonizes legions of fathers, the traditional dispensers of spankings and other painful punishments. Many parents believe spankings teach children to behave better'and the mere threat of future spankings makes them think twice about misbehaving. The same reasoning is applied in schools. ?I don't think it hurts [for teachers] to express some anger once in a while,? Arizona lawmaker Bev Hermon told The Phoenix Gazette. Hermon, who chairs the legislature's education committee, has used her position t o block action on a measure that would ban corporal punishment.

Whenever the subject of corporal punishment arises, proponents of paddling in schools advance some variation of this ?I don't think it hurts? argument. During the Olentangy debate, Jerry Cline, one of the board members who voted to keep corporal punishment, offered this version: ?I don't think a swat on the rear end hurts any kid. Our administrators should be allowed to do their job as effectively as possible. And if they feel that corporal punishment is an effective deterrent, I don't see any reason whatsoever to change our policy.?

Gary Bauer, a former high-level Reagan administration official, says he remembers refraining from the temptation to break school rules because he feared the paddle. Now president of the Family Research Council, a ?conservative, profamily? think tank, Bauer sees nothing wrong with continuing the tradition of corporal punishment, especially on elementary school students. ?With younger children,? he argues, 'the threat of a slap on the rear can often be enough to keep a classroom in line. The reasonable use of spanking doesn't run the risk of any kind of damage to the child. It? s more likely to help the child develop into a reasonable citizen.?

Bauer's Family Research Council was one of the few organizations that praised Washington, D.C., Mayor Sharon Pratt Kelly when she suggested last spring that schools in the nation's capital consider bringing back the paddle. Educators and other children's advocates roundly condemned Kelly when she said teachers and principals in her city need 'the authority to discipline, including, if need be, spanking young people.? Implicit in Kelly's appeal is a longing for the days when educators ruled with authoritarian firmness. ?You were terrified of violating the rules of the teacher,? she told NBC-TV, ?and my goodness, if you ended up in the principal's office, that was the worst thing possible.? As some perceptive observers point out, however, none of Kelly's visits to the office could have resulted in a paddling because the district'where she attended public school'outlawed corporal punishment more than 70 years ago.

Kelly, who lacks the authority to reinstate paddling, quickly backed off her proposal. But her argument clearly strikes a responsive chord among some educators, such as Jean Baresic, a math teacher at McGary Middle School in Evansville, Ind. Baresic, who says she has used the paddle sparingly'but effectively, in her view'over the years, supports her district's ?proper and appropriate? use of corporal punishment. She recalls paddling one male student after a girl complained that the boy had been touching her improperly. ?Sad to say,? Baresic says, ?but some students don't respond to anything short of that. I?ve tried everything, then I give them one swat on the behind, and they straighten up for the rest of the year. There are a lot of kids who will back off just because they know I'll use it, so I rarely have to use it.?

To its proponents, corporal punishment is essentially just another disciplinary tool, perhaps a bit more severe than, say, detention hall, but not qualitatively different. Opponents disagree. To them, school personnel have no right to cross the line from verbal discipline to physical punishment. Spanking may be appropriate in the home, they say, but it has no place in school. ?Professional educators who are trained and licensed have an obligation not to follow the bad examples of families,? argues Jordan Riak, who almost single-handedly persuaded California's legislature to ban corporal punishment in 1986.

?We want to see children have better ways of dealing with problems,? says Nadine Block, coordinator of the National Coalition to Abolish Corporal Punishment in the Schools. ?If we in the schools do not teach children to solve problems with words, if we hit them for being aggressive and fighting, we can't expect that they will learn to do things differently. We need to be a good example.?

Regina Pitcher certainly didn't like the example Casa Grande (Ariz.) Junior High School set for her son, Jacob. Most schools notify parents by phone when their children are paddled. But Pitcher, a science teacher at her son's school, merely had to walk about 100 feet down the hall to find out that the shop teacher had paddled Jacob and two classmates for nicking a table with a router. The paddling took place despite Pitcher's written request that Jacob be included on the school's ?no-swat list,? a roster circulated to teachers listing students whose parents don't want their children paddled.

When Pitcher complained to the superintendent, she was told it was ?a personnel matter.? Pitcher saw it differently and filed a police report. A detective investigated her complaint, but ultimately, the county attorney declined to prosecute the shop teacher. ?If I did this to my own son in my own home,? says Pitcher, referring to a paddle-shaped welt that didn? t go away for two weeks, ?I would be brought up for child abuse.?

Bruises like Jacob's probably represent the most common injury caused by paddling. But opponents of corporal punishment provide vivid descriptions'often accompanied by full-color photos'of other wounds inflicted on students in the name of discipline. It's a list that would make a stunt man or rodeo cowboy proud: broken bones, ruptured blood vessels, hematomas, muscle and nerve damage, whiplash, spinal injuries, and many more. Corporal punishment has also been implicated in student deaths, such as that of an Edwardsburg, Mich., boy who died of cardiac arrest in 1988 while doing a forced running exercise as a form of punishment.

And while paddles'many of them constructed in wood shop by their potential victims'are the most common instrument of physical discipline, corporal punishment certainly isn't limited to paddling. ?Children are beaten, slapped, punched, whipped, thrown against walls, stuck with pins, locked in closets, forced to eat noxious substances, and abused in other creatively sadistic ways,? according to Major Owens, a Democratic congressman from New York, who includes being shocked with a cattle prod, burned with tacking irons, chained to a car bumper and dragged around a parking lot, and locked in a coffin-shaped box in the ?creatively sadistic? category. Owens, a long-time opponent of corporal punishment, has introduced legislation that would withhold federal funds from any educational institution that allows corporal punishment, although the measure stands little chance of passing.

While many focus on the physical trauma associated with corporal punishment, educational psychologist Irwin Hyman, who heads the National Center for the Study of Corporal Punishment and Alternatives in the Schools, has trained his work on the emotional and psychological impact. He maintains that 1 percent to 2 percent of students who are paddled develop what he calls ?educator-induced post traumatic stress disorder.? In young children, Hyman sees bed-wetting, sleep disorders, and increased anxiety, among many other symptoms. Adolescents? symptoms include depression, poor peer relationships, and even thoughts of suicide. ?Pain temporarily suppresses behavior,? Hyman says. ?It also causes anger, humiliation, and a desire to get revenge.?

Hyman's studies have also shown that corporal punishment tends to be passed down through the generations; teachers who were hit as children do most of the paddling in schools. Another study, done in the mid-1980s by two researchers at Middle Tennessee State University, developed a psychological profile of paddle-wielding teachers. The researchers? conclusions don't paint a very flattering picture. ?Heavy users of corporal punishment,? they reported, 'tended to be relatively inexperienced, closed-minded, neurotic, and impulsive compared to their peers who did not use corporal punishment.?

Shocking as they may be, these litanies of physical injury, psychological damage, and seemingly unstable teachers have not turned the vast majority of teachers and the general population against corporal punishment. A 1988 Gallup poll found that 50 percent of the public approves of paddling in schools, 45 percent oppose it, and 5 percent aren't sure. Deep divisions also mark teachers? opinions on the issue, although most surveys show that a slight majority of teachers oppose the use of corporal punishment. If regional figures were available, they would almost certainly indicate a Civil War-type split, with many more Southern teachers favoring the paddle than their colleagues in other parts of the country.

For some people, it takes a firsthand experience with paddling to change their minds. Take Dick Schafrath, a rather unlikely figure in the movement to ban corporal punishment. A Republican senator in the Ohio legislature, Schafrath ...

You are currently seeing 50% of this paper.

You're seeing 2526 words of 5051.

Read the full essay

Keywords: corporal punishment definition, corporal punishment in schools, corporal punishment is another way of saying, corporal punishment meaning in hindi, corporal punishment examples, corporal punishment debate, corporal punishment in the philippines, corporal punishment uk

Similar essays

Ecology Assignment

1. Explain why any one species cannot live everywhere. Any species cannot live everywhere because this would effect the natural balance. Also one species cannot adapt to all the different environments of our planet. For example a marine creature can only live underwater and cannot live on ground. 2. Explain how the activities of some spe...

156 reviews

Download

Network 2

A computer network is a group of interconnected computers that can accomplish many important tasks. To define computer networking you should define networks. A network is composed of two or people or objects, using a common language, and they have something to share. In computer networking the two or more objects are the computer or terminal...

43 reviews

Download

Biological and nuclear weapons

Most people today believe that the world is a better place than it was 20 to 30 years ago. But I, on the other hand, believe that the world is becoming a very dangerous place. Even though the world's superpowers condemn nuclear and biological warfare, I believe that the next millennium will bring a war that will make them change their beliefs t...

106 reviews

Download

Coral fish

As a by standee over viewing the preparation and or the act of courtship in the coral reef fishes, one may think they have taken leave of their senses. The bicolor damselfish tends to quiver while performing a headstand. Blue pullers engage in a series of high-speed jumps. Lyretailfish swim in jerky zigzag patters. Frillfish goby undulates...

5 reviews

Download

Biology heat loss practical write up

Biology Coursework Practical ' Heat Loss The aim of this practical is to find to what extent does the surface area to volume ratio of an object affect the rate of heat loss from the object Hypothesis: As the ratio of surface area to volume of an object decreases the rate of heat loss from the object will also decrease. Objects with th...

99 reviews

Download