- Discover essay samples

Animal Ethics

4.9 of 5.0 (80 reviews)

899 words
Social Issues

Animal Ethics Page 1
Animal Ethics Page 2
Animal Ethics Page 3
Animal Ethics Page 4
Animal Ethics Page 5
Animal Ethics Page 6
The above thumbnails are of reduced quality. To view the work in full quality, click download.

is concerned with the status of animals, whereas
environmental ethics concerns itself with the relationship to the environment.
I will show the existence of depends on the existence of
environmental ethics. I will prove this by showing that such philosophers who
have practiced animal ethics such as Singer, Regan, and Taylor are limited
because they are individualistic. Which means they are limited to animal
concerns, and nothing else. But with the environmental ethics such
philosophers as Leapold, Wesra and Naess look at the environment ethics
collectively. Which means they look at the big picture which includes the
animals and its environment.

I will first look at the views of Peter Singer, who is a utilitarian. A
utilitarian is someone who believes the greatest amount of good for the greatest
number. Singer wants the suffering of animals to be taken into consideration.
He states 'If a being suffers, there can be no moral justification for refusing
to take that suffering into consideration. No matter what the nature of the
being, the principle of equality requires that its suffering be counted equally
with the like suffering...'. What this means is that the suffering of animals
is not justified. He also states how he thinks a major way to stop the
suffering of animals is to stop the experimenting on animals. He states'...the
widespread practice of experimenting on other species in order to see if certain
substances are safe for human beings, or to test some psychological theory
about the effect of severe punishment or learning...'. When he is talking
about the experiments and suffering of animals. He is concerned most with
domestic animals, he is not too concerned with the other animals in the word.
Views like these make Singer limited.

Singer is limited and individualistic because he is not concerned with
the environment in which animals live and since he is a utilitarian, equality
is not something he is concerned with. Even other philosopher criticizes the
utilitarian point of view exhibited by Singer. Regan protests 'Utilitarian has
no room for the equal moral rights of different individuals because it has no
room for their equal inherent value or worth. What has value for the
utilitarian is the satisfaction of an individuals interests, not the individual
whose interests they are'. If things are not given equal rights, that
includes the environment there will be a tomorrow to look forward to.

Singer has also been known to show a lack of compassion and sympathy.
As stated by Westra 'IT is probable that, at a minimum, instrumental values has
always been ascribed to those animals which have contributed in some way to the
human community down through ages...Still it is possible to raise doubts about
sympathy, as many claim to have no such feeling, including such animals
defenders as Singer'. Westra goes on to describe how Singer is not only
unsympathetic to that of animals with intrinsic value but to those people in the
third world. Singer feels that since the people of the third world are so far
away that it is not of his concern. Singer wants the suffering of animals to
stop because it is not justified, but what makes the suffering of third world
countries justified? Because they are further away? Such individualistic
approaches will not save the habitat in which the animals live and without that
the environment will not survive. Singer is not the only one with an
individualistic approach.

Another philosopher of environmental ethics Tom Regan also displays the
individualistic approach. Regan believes in Cantianism. What that means is
that the individuals have rights. Regan has modified it a bit to say that
everyone is subject to a life. Regan believes that animal and humans all have
intrinsic value, therefor they have a right to life. He calls for three changes
'1) The total abolition of the use of animals in science. 2) The total
dissolution of commercial animal agriculture. 3) The Total elimination of
commercial and sport hunting'. He believes that animals should not be treated
as our resources. he also believes that since everyone is subject to a life
people should not believe in contractarianism. Contractarianism states that in
order to gain morality you must be able to sign and understand a contract and if
they can not sign a contract (i.e. infant) you do not have the right to morality.
But Regan also views things individualisticly.

He, like Singer also looks at the concerns of animals, of 'Value'.
Those animals used in science experiments, agriculture, and commercial and
sport hunting. But what about the animals not included in the list, who is
going to protect the rights of those animals? Without all animals and
especially the environment. Regan will not just have to worry about the reform
of animal rights.

The last philosopher concerned with animal ethics in which I am going to
look at is Paul Taylor. He is an egalitarian, which means everyone's interests<...

You are currently seeing 50% of this paper.

You're seeing 899 words of 1798.

Keywords: animal ethics committee, animal ethics in research, animal ethics pdf, animal ethics definition, animal ethics philosophy, animal ethics ppt, animal ethics dilemma, animal ethics examples

Similar essays


is an emotion of strong affection and personal attachment.[1] In philosophical context, love is a virtue representing all of human kindness, compassion, and affection. is central to many religions, as in the Christian phrase, "God is love" or Agape in the Canonical gospels.[2] may also be described as actions towards others (or oneself) based on...

127 reviews
Young Adults and Alcohol

The drinking age in the United States is a contradiction. At the age of eighteen, one can drive a car, vote in an election, get married, serve in the military and buy tobacco products. In the United States you are legally an adult at eighteen. An eighteen-year-old, however, can not purchase alcoholic beverages. The minimum drinking...

149 reviews

Gripping his cup of mocha as if it were a necessary drug, my friend Peppy LeHaji sternly versed his opinion at me one day, ?? is the name of the game,?? he said, ??In today?_s world, things change so fast that history is irrelevant.?? After stating his opinion, he repositioned the patch on his shoulder, in hope that it would bette...

173 reviews
Sexual Discrimination

The world today must deal with many problems. Our society has been struggling to cope with difficulties ranging from environmental problems to economic problems. Solutions to these problems, however, are not too hard to find. There is one problem, however, that our society has been dealing with for a very long time. The problem is . When thinking o...

85 reviews
Unrelated Men in Households and Children Fatalities or Abuse

A recent event brings attentions to a problem in our society, and that is the risk associated with substitute male figures in a child?s home. The situation is played out across the country everyday, boyfriends of a child?s mother abusing them or worse yet killing them. Why is there so much strain in these situations, and why do s...

100 reviews
Atsisiųsti šį darbą